Here we have a story from Idaho wherein a poor lunchroom worker’s job is hanging in the balance because she apparently gave a student a lunch.
POCATELLO, Idaho – Lunch lady Darlene Bowden could lose her job for giving away a free lunch to a hungry student, despite offering to pay for the $1.70 lunch out of her own pocket.
Bowden told the Idaho State Journal she was placed on unpaid “termination leave” by her supervisor at the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District 25 for giving away a lunch to a hungry 12-year-old at Irving Middle School who didn’t have money to cover the meal.
So we can assume that, if anyone’s going to get credit for giving away other people’s money, it’s not going to be a lowly lunchroom worker.
It’s a fascinating story really. If a student arrives at the checkout and doesn’t have enough money to pay, then the entire lunch is dumped into the trash, according to the article, and the child is “discreetly” given a milk and PBJ sandwich. I’m sure none of the other students in the institutional feeding hall have any clue what it means when a poor child sits down among his fellow students with his brown bag of government compassion.
So here we have the institution ready to spend tons of other people’s money to ensure boys who think they’re girls– or simply like looking at naked girls–can use the girls locker rooms and bathrooms. But a poor lunchroom worker is on the ropes because she gave away a buck-seventy lunch. As the article reveals, this lady is well known and well received in the schoolhouse, and that just won’t do. The god/state is to be praised for all magnanimity at the taxpayer’s expense , not the lowly.
The truth is that your eleven year old is mature enough to fix her own lunch, and even mature enough to fix the family’s lunch. Not only that, it’s educational for an 11 year old to prepare meals because when you homeschool, as I always say, school is never necessarily not in session.
Jesus told Satan that, “man does not live on bread alone.” There is a bread that is spiritual. But it only stands to reason that a system of government that rejects the existence of God, and puts itself in His stead, would see all this world from a purely materialistic/naturalistic point of view. So, it also stands to reason that while there is wild concern about the happenstance that is the human body’s health, there is complete ignorance and silence on its purpose beyond getting a good education and making as much money as possible so it can enjoy every useless and meaningless pleasure happenstance has placed before it to enjoy. And you can’t make lots of money and get knocked up–or knock y0ung girls up–if you’re not healthy. Worse, it’s a drag if half the eligible sex partners are overweight and unhealthy. So here comes Johnny Utopia to fix all that ails horny humanity by snatching those nabisco cookies right out of mother’s lunch bag. Everyone knows mom’s an idiot anyway.
But weight! I thought Nabisco was wholesome to the core. Doesn’t nabisco love the LGBT society? And doesn’t it hate homophobes? Isn’t the school sending a confused message to the poor pupils with this policy? So what gives?
No worries, those kids are going to eat those Oreos anyway. How do I know? Because the schoolhouse has been preaching for years that the “kids are going to do it anyway”. Of course the schoolhouse only meant having sex when they said that. I guess they’ve never experienced the pleasure of biting down on a double cream filled Oreo. Now that’s pleasure. And unlike sex, mom can pack it in your little brown sack lunch. But, of course, the fearless school administrators know that they won’t get sued by the ACLU for telling the students not to “do it anyway” when it comes to Nabisco’s fat-cat corprateer cookies. But who knows? Maybe Nabisco can double down and invent a sugar condom.
Never forget. Your children, nor you, have to live this way. There is a simple alternative.