I find this story somewhat fascinating.
It’s the typical story of a teacher having sex with a student. But the story has a little bit of twist to it beyond the fact that her young lover is one of her middle school students, or even beyond the fact that she got pregnant, or that his parents evidently knew about the fling. The twist happens when some people from Child Protective Services come snooping around her school asking questions. So she’s off to the local Planned Parenthood butchers to have their baby murdered.
Yes, that’s a harsh description of what she did. The word “abortion” is much more palatable. But a crushed and dismembered baby is a crushed and dismembered baby no matter how much the act of crushing and dismembered the baby is sugar coated. Yet those who are charged by your government to “protect children” could care less about the crushing and dismembering of children. It seems they’re much more concerned with two people copulating because that’s not “appropriate”. And it’s so “not appropriate” that the police are involved and she’s in a little trouble, the worst of which is she may have to register as a child molester. could have identified as a man and walked into this boy’s bathroom and dropped her pants in front of him and she would have been called a hero. She could have had sex with the entire Dallas Cowboys football team and had it filmed and she would have been cheered. She even murdered their baby, and could have gotten on TV in her few minutes of fame and bragged publicly about it and gained the accolades of her employer… and she might just do that yet. But the act of having sex with him is… well inappropriate.
But she could have identified as a man and walked into this boy’s bathroom and dropped her pants in front of him and she would have been called a hero. She could have given him the gory details about every debased form of sexual activity known to man just by following her state’s dictates on perverted sexual indoctrination. She could have had sex with the entire Dallas Cowboys football team and filmed it and she would have been cheered. She even murdered their baby. But the act of having sex with him is… well… inappropriate.
Please don’t get me wrong. I’m not okay with her having sex with this young man. But I don’t think it was “inappropriate”. I think it was a sin. But the state doesn’t do sin anymore. let’s look at it. For one, sex is a procreative act, and as such it is reserved for those who are married so that the child, both in and out of his mother’s womb, will have
So let’s look at it. For one, sex is a procreative act, and as such is reserved for those who are married so that the child, both in and out of his mother’s womb, will have care-takers who will actually take care of it and won’t have it butchered. Whether or not these two were ready for marriage is another question entirely. But just because two people are not ready for marriage is not a permission slip to act as if they are married anyway, and create offspring, and then murder that offspring.
There was a time in America that the state had an interest in the welfare of society. (Not the Orwellian “welfare” that is the enslaving vote buying scheme we know today.) Such ways are now fairytales. The only welfare the state is interested in now is the its own. And one of the best tools it has for ensuring that welfare is the sprawling, flat-roofed, brick and mortar compound just down the street. But sometimes the knowledge of some of the escapades that go on there escape into the media when the people encapsulated within actually begin to practice what is preached a little too early, and get caught.
The state, and it’s schoolhouse, will not teach your children right from wrong. On the contrary, it will teach them a bazaar and ever-changing list of what the judicial oligarchy has decreed is appropriate and inappropriate things that can and cannot be done or said. If that sounds good to you, then by all means send your child to the state to be turned into confused little slaves who think they are free because they can have sex with no limitations. But if that doesn’t sound all that wonderful to you, there is a legal alternative. Keep them home far from this madhouse.