Reason 347: Because This Is Coming, Sooner Than You Think

It seems like it’s been no time at all since people were promising me that two men would never be able to get married in the U.S. Of course, they still can’t because it would be impossible. But the state doesn’t see it that way, and it’ll do everything in its power to make your children not see it that way either.

Now, in our present day,  people are promising that pedophilia will never be acceptable. But, of course, they’re wrong. It will. And the schoolhouse is where it will be pushed, softly at first, and then with the iron fist of government later.

I can remember reading articles like this one, except they were about homosexuality then:

Social Conservatives Speak Out Against Book That Suggests Morality of Pedophilia Is ‘Unclear’

You are sending your children to an institution that has proven itself morally bankrupt, and worse. What great moral wall of protection does the institution possess that stands between this mentality and the thousands of children corralled into a compound?  Answer: None? It possesses no wall at all. Even now, the worst it can say about your child being molested is that such things are “inappropriate”.  Does that strike confidence and security into your hearts regarding your children? You should be afraid if you’re sending your child to public school. Very afraid indeed.

 

Reason 268: Because Your Children Really Do Need To Be Taught Right From Wrong

I find this story somewhat fascinating.

Authorities: Teacher Admits She Became Pregnant by Young Student, Says His Parents Approved of Relationship

It’s the typical story of a teacher having sex with a student. But the story has a little bit of twist to it beyond the fact that her young lover is one of her middle school students, or even beyond the fact that she got pregnant, or that his parents evidently knew about the fling. The twist happens when some people from Child Protective Services come snooping around her school asking questions. So she’s off to the local Planned Parenthood butchers to have their baby murdered.

Yes, that’s a harsh description of what she did. The word “abortion” is much more palatable. But a crushed and dismembered baby is a crushed and dismembered baby no matter how much the act of crushing and dismembered the baby is sugar coated.  Yet those who are charged by your government to “protect children” could care less about the crushing and dismembering of children. It seems they’re much more concerned with two people copulating because that’s not “appropriate”.  And it’s so “not appropriate” that the police are involved and she’s in a little trouble, the worst of which is she may have to register as a child molester.  could have identified as a man and walked into this boy’s bathroom and dropped her pants in front of him and she would have been called a hero. She could have had sex with the entire Dallas Cowboys football team and had it filmed and she would have been cheered. She even murdered their baby, and could have gotten on TV in her few minutes of fame and bragged publicly about it and gained the accolades of her employer… and she might just do that yet. But the act of having sex with him is… well inappropriate.

But she could have identified as a man and walked into this boy’s bathroom and dropped her pants in front of him and she would have been called a hero. She could have given him the gory details about every debased form of sexual activity known to man just by following her state’s dictates on perverted sexual indoctrination. She could have had sex with the entire Dallas Cowboys football team and filmed it and she would have been cheered. She even murdered their baby. But the act of having sex with him is… well… inappropriate.

Please don’t get me wrong. I’m not okay with her having sex with this young man. But I don’t think it was “inappropriate”. I think it was a sin. But the state doesn’t do sin anymore. let’s look at it. For one, sex is a procreative act, and as such it is reserved for those who are married so that the child, both in and out of his mother’s womb, will have

So let’s look at it. For one, sex is a procreative act, and as such is reserved for those who are married so that the child, both in and out of his mother’s womb, will have care-takers who will actually take care of it and won’t have it butchered. Whether or not these two were ready for marriage is another question entirely. But just because two people are not ready for marriage is not a permission slip to act as if they are married anyway, and create offspring, and then murder that offspring.

There was a time in America that the state had an interest in the welfare of society. (Not the Orwellian “welfare” that is the enslaving vote buying scheme we know today.) Such ways are now fairytales. The only welfare the state is interested in now is the its own. And one of the best tools it has for ensuring that welfare is the sprawling, flat-roofed, brick and mortar compound just down the street. But sometimes the knowledge of some of the escapades that go on there escape into the media when the people encapsulated within actually begin to practice what is preached a little too early, and get caught.

The state, and it’s schoolhouse, will not teach your children right from wrong.  On the contrary, it will teach them a bazaar and ever-changing list of what the judicial oligarchy has decreed is appropriate and inappropriate things that can and cannot be done or said. If that sounds good to you, then by all means send your child to the state to be turned into confused little slaves who think they are free because they can have sex with no limitations. But if that doesn’t sound all that wonderful to you, there is a legal alternative. Keep them home far from this madhouse.

Reason 196: Because Only Dead Fish Float Down The Institution’s River Of Distruction

Imagine, if you will, a university professor way back in 1965 proclaiming that it is evil for anyone to oppose two men getting married; or that it was evil to stop a boy who is “confused” about his gender from being allowed to use the girl’s locker room at the schoolhouse. That was a short half century ago, yet we know that that professor would have been considered mentally ill for suggesting such things at that time. So how did we get from the mores of 1965 to today’s morality? Well, the answer is sitting just down the street from your house. It’s a big government building with a flat roof and a fence around it. No matter where you are as you read this, there’s a good chance you’re within walking distance of one of these buildings. And it was inside these buildings that the changes took place, almost imperceptible to those who were not paying attention; to those who trusted that institution because it was the same one that they were indoctrinated in themselves. But little by little, precept by precept, line by line, the schoolhouse changed the thinking of a nation to accept what ought not be accepted.

That was then. This is now, and now we have a story, from the author of Outlasting the Gay Revolution, that looks at the new army of “gay bullies” that are the fruit of the institution. He discusses the goings on in universities around the Western world mostly, but as you read his work, keep in mind a couple of things. First, To be qualified to work in your neighborhood’s  government building, a teacher must be “certified” by these universities. Second, the changes you’re experiencing have not occurred, they are occurring. We are not living in a static reality that exists now in post-Christian America.  We are living in the midst of dynamic times. There is no destination for the institution’s much touted “progress”, only movement… down the river if you will. The indoctrination going on now is just as “cutting edge” as it was back in the forties when the children were being prepared to become the secular humanists by which the roads were paved for the  Supreme Court to overstep it bounds by “outlawing” prayer in school, or in the fifties when children were being prepared to accept the killing of innocent human beings in the womb, and so on… and on…  it goes. While you, dear parent, are simply fighting the present, the institution is preparing your child to accept its abominations in the future.

So keep this in mind as you read this article:

As Predicted, Here Come The Gay Bullies

But also keep in mind as you read that it’s not just “gay bullies”. It’s transgender bullies, wealth redistribution bullies, atheist bullies, anti-family bullies, pro-centralized government power bullies, anti-gun bullies, racism bullies, pedophile bullies, planned parenthood bullies, and more. And when you send your child to the bully instituion you are also sending your child an unspoken message that says, “dear child of mine, I accept these bullies.” So don’t be surprised to discover that your child has floated down the river, like a dead fish, that you put him in. Best to swim against the river, and the best way to do that is to not put your child in the rapids in the first place.

 

Reason 175: Because Of The Increasingly Familiar Sexual Predator On The Payroll

Here’s the all too familiar story:

Kindergarten Teacher Accused Of Molestation

The headline is misleading. This woman’s profession was a kindergarten teacher. The young man she had the “inappropriate” relationship with was 14; hardly a kindergartener. She was 47, which means that if he had been her son, she’d have been 33 when she bore him.  That’s quite an age difference in my opinion, but what does it matter? The teacher and this young man were only doing what they’ve been indoctrinated to do. The institution and the media can only muster a word like “inappropriate” to describe it. Do people go to jail for “inappropriate” relationships? I think not, but this woman may.

But why don’t we put this in some context for discussion’s sake. We have the institution, from its highest levels confused on who is male and female. They can’t figure out who should be using female and male locker rooms; a thing that no civil society has ever been confused on before. In its moral confusion, it has decided that this very same young man ought to be able to walk into the girl’s locker room and undress among them if he says he feels like a girl, and it says that if you don’t like that there’s something wrong with you. And he can even have sex with one of those young girls without breaking any laws, and then he can impregnate her and the institution will help her murder the child, after which they will send you the bill. All this goes on without a peep from the institution.

If this had been an older man who fornicated with a young woman, for his sake the institution also invites Planned Parenthood on campus, an organization that has repeatedly hidden statutory rape from authorities. So, I’m sorry, I’m not “shocked” that this older woman had sex with this young man, and in comparison with all the activities that the institution considers legal, I think this actually pales. But I am sorry for both of the poor souls in this story because, in a way, they’re both victims of the zeitgeist of lawlessness that the institution has done its best to bring about. This couple simply made the mistake of believing the institution’s lies that there is no ultimate morality, and now she is receiving the wrath of the same institution that told her she was the sole arbiter of right and wrong for herself.

So a few points:

1. Not everyone who does this gets caught. It would be naive to think that it isn’t a common thing.
2. The schoolhouse has painted itself into a corner and looks hypocritical and foolish reacting the way it does on account of a little “inappropriate” behavior. Who are they/you to judge after all? People gonna do what people gonna do. They can’t control themselves. Right?  The only thing they might have done wrong, if one listens to the institution, was to not use a condom.
3. Please don’t ever be the moron who says “I’m shocked!”. It really does make you look like you live under a rock.
4. Your children are not safe in that little small-town school that makes you feel all warm and fuzzy. The zeitgeist everywhere receives federal money and has the internet, which means it’s everywhere, with the possible exception of your home. There it’s up to you whether or not you invite it in, to defile your children.

Reason 135: Because The Schoolhouse Is Where The Foundations For These Changes Are Laid

Please don’t live in the here and now; a place where men can marry men, and girls can kill their babies, and teachers routinely defile their students, and promiscuity is normal and even expected. Things won’t always be this way you know. They will change, and it won’t be for the best, and the schoolhouse will do what it can to see to it… with your precious child if you let it.

There are lots of harmful things coming, but it must be remembered that these changes don’t come in a vacuum. People’s minds must be prepared for them from an early age. Enter the schoolhouse.

This article is not about the public school in particular. But at the same time it’s very much about public school, because that’s where minds are programmed to accept harmful behaviors while they are at the same time trained to reject morality as you would have it for your child.

The article from Red State:

We Are On the Road To Normalizing Pedophilia

It wasn’t that long ago that the headline was the same, except that it was homosexuality being “normalized”. Yet so many still have the gall to say that the aceptance of pedophillia can’t happen… that it won’t happen; as if that same old refrain hasn’t been sung over and over. I found this little excerpt to say all that needs to be said:

The unfortunate truth is that pedophiles and their sympathizers are using the homosexual rights playbook. The same arguments Anthony Kennedy (and I have no evidence that Kennedy is a pedophile) made in deciding Lawrence vs. Texas and hammered home in Obergefell vs. Hodges can be applied directly to pedophiles.

Yes, the same play book, and we might as well say it, the same school house.

H/T Eternity Matters

Reason 115: Because The Institution Is A Confederacy Of Evil

If there is an evil, God-hating, liberal organization out there somewhere, you can just bet that the schoolhouse has the red carpet laid out for it at the front door because we know that birds of a feather flock together. It’s not like there is the education institution over here, and the butchers at Planned Parenthood over there. No, the institution and Planned Parenthood are one, and they are one in the same way that any number of other organization with evil designs for your child’s mind are one. To see them as separate entities is folly. It would behoove you to just see them all as different departments in one big Confederacy of Evil.

This leads us to the point of this post, which is a study, called the Kinsey Study, made famous by one of the departments of the Confederacy of Evil, the so-called “mainstream media”, who themselves were also thoroughly indoctrinated into an evolutionist’s mindset.

Have you ever heard of Alfred Kinsey? If you haven’t, and you are a parent who is sending your children to the institution for an education, please don’t take this wrong, but I feel sorry for your children… and I mean that. I really do, because if you are ignorant of the evils increasingly prevalent in your world, how can you possibly protect your children from them, much less equip them to protect themselves?

I happened across this blog called “While it’s yet day“, that posted a you tube video discussing the Kinsey Study and its content. This video and blog post catalogs a bit of the depths of the depraved despair of the institution and our culture, which includes sexual abuse of young children in the name of “science”. If it seems our days are getting darker, there is a reason, and the public education institution is playing a vital role in that reason.

From “While it’s yet day”:

The understanding that we have of childhood sexuality and normal childhood sexual development as it is believed and taught in academia today comes from the experimental evidence documented in Kinsey’s report published in 1948 with the childhood sexuality tables that we have just discussed. It is absolutely astonishing that this is taken as the basis of what we understand to be normal childhood sexual development.

And when I try to explain this to colleagues in the type of science I’m involved with in what I call the harder sciences of biology or medicine, statistics, immunology, they do not believe what I’m trying to tell them. And the only way I can convince them of the truth of this is to go to the library, pull off the shelf of Alfred Kinsey’s books and show them what is inside. And it’s quite shocking.

Of course, this is one thing; a study that was done a half-century ago. But remember, it is a Confederacy of Evil. A bit more from the blog post:

• Working with the Kinsey team was Mary Calderone, medical director of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America from 1953 to 1964. She later founded the Sex Information and Educational Council of the United States.
• Teachers in the US are only trained in the Kinsey sex education model.
• Sex conditioning under the guise of AIDS prevention begins in Kindergarten.

We, as citizens in a dark culture become darkened ourselves without even realizing it. And we make our children even darker than we are by sending them right into the bowels of the Confederacy of Evil. But no one has to do that, and I urge all to stop doing it now, while “it is yet day”.

Reason 48: Because The School House Is At The Cutting Edge Of This New Trend

By the time I was in high school the stigma associated with unmarried sex had evaporated. So I watched our society reap in earnest its first crop of abortions, single moms, fatherless children and STD’s.  Old restraints were being cast off without the first thought as to why they were ever put there in the first place. This means that I’ve never actually lived in a world in which there was a stigma associated with premarital sex and promiscuity. But such a world hasn’t always existed. It’s just that these things were incrementally destigmatized in previous generations. And there’s been quite a few increments of destigmatization to pass under the bridge since. But there’s a new thing on the horizon that ought to scare anyone who is looking to trust the state to look after their children, and that’s pedophilia.

If you’ve lived through one thing in history you’re quick to pick up on the same sort of thing when it begins to repeat itself. I can remember, for example, homosexuality when it was just beginning to impose itself onto society. It was of course frowned upon. And all who warned of where it would lead were referred to as Chicken Littles. Well, that sky has fallen. And I’m another chicken little warning that there’s more sky coming down.

But there’s a better Chicken Little than me talking about this.  His name is Ben Shapiro and here’s a link to his article in which he says:

Weeks ago, I wrote that the left “has a new crusade: legitimizing child molestation.” That crusade continues apace today in the pages of The Independent (UK), where psychologist Glenn Wilson writes, “in my studies of the activist group Paedophile Information Exchange, many members admitted sexual feelings for children, which they had been able to turn to social good.” This is nothing new, of course. In early October, Salon.com led the way in championing the decency of pedophiles.

But now, the Independent is going further, suggesting that pedophiles may actually provide increased social good. “[W]e need to keep a sense of proportion here,” writes Wilson. “There is a danger of becoming hysterical about paedophilia and seeing it everywhere, like witches at Salem, or ‘Commies’ in Hollywood during McCarthyism. Paedophiles do exist, but there are very few of them and not all are child molesters.”

Also, Here we have a judge in Australia blazing a trail. And that’s where the paths for future debauchery are smoothed, in the judiciary, because they’re beyond the poor stupid serf’s political reach. And this judge is no lone ranger.

It will take a little while, but this is for sure coming to your child’s schoolhouse, and is already there to some degree. A little thought goes a long way.  Consider for instance that you’re a pedophile. So just where on this planet can you find masses of young innocent children who are just now beginning to get the first waves of indoctrination into a world in which sex with the teacher, or other adults, might not be such a bad thing after all? Why your friendly public school just down the street from your house, that’s where.

Don’t be the first on your block to have your daughter come home carrying her teacher’s child; or a son carrying his teacher’s AIDS. And please don’t hide your head in the sand. That’s one of the most dangerous things you can do in this cruel, brutal and oversexed zeitgeist.

Reason 25: Because There Is An Agenda, And You Wouldn’t Like It

From Jonathon Van Maren at Life Site

Parents, don’t be fooled: The sex-ed agenda is more sinister than you know

From the article:

It’s a rare, if not historic pushback—tens of thousands of people across the Canadian province of Ontario are announcing loudly that they oppose the new sex education curriculum proposed by the province’s premier, Kathleen Wynne…  The entire phenomenon is startling … First of all, school systems have been implementing sex education programs that parents have disliked or outright opposed for decades now—but never has a movement of this size and tenacity congealed around opposing a curriculum and the politicians seeking to implement it, until now.

All you need to know is that every agenda has its setbacks.  Some times the natives have to be appeased until they get used to the ever increasing temperature of the water in their pot.  But know this is temporary.  The parents will eventually concede and allow the state to continue to corrupt the minds of their children.  Indeed their own minds are suffering from a lesser corruption from when they went through the state system.

I can only point to a spiritual reason that the state is so dedicated to destroying these children’s possibility of a happy married life with children.   It has always been in the state’s best interest that families stay in tack.  It’s no fun being a tyrant to hordes of amoral sex-addicted barbarians.  But know this, you only need to know three things about the state’s education of your children, sex, sex, and more sex.